Search CTRL + K

Lecture 10 - Solvability of Linear Operator Equations

Conditions of the solvability of linear operator equations

We are interested in solving Tu=f for a given T and f, where T is a bounded linear operator on a Hilbert space H.

Proposition

If T∈B(H) (that is T is bounded operator from H to H), then Ker(T∗)=R(T)⊥
In particular R(T)―=Ker(T∗)⊥

Proof

We know that the R(T)⊂Ker(T∗)⊥ and Ker(T∗)⊂R(T)⊥ . We want to prove that R(T)⊥⊂Ker(T∗).
Let v∈R(T)⊥, then for any arbitrary u∈H we have:

⟨u,T∗v⟩=⟨Tu,v⟩=0 [Since Tu∈R(T)]

thus T∗v=0, i.e, v∈Ker(T∗).
Note that if E⊂X then E⊥ is closed, one can show that E―=E⊥⊥ thus R(T)―=Ker(T∗)⊥

Corollary

If T∈B(H) and T has a closed R(T), then:

R(T)=Ker(T∗)⊥

That is to say Tu=f has a solution iff f∈Ker(T∗)⊥.

Definition

If T is any linear operator, we define the Rank(T)=dim(R(T)), and we say that T is a finite rank operator whenever the Rank(T) is finite.

Recall that any finite dim sub-space is closed.

Corollary

If T∈B(H) is a finite rank operator then R(T)=Ker(T∗)⊥.

Example

Let H=L2([0,1]) and

Tu(x)=∫01xyu(y)dy

Then R(T)=span{e} where e(x)=x, so Rank(T)=1. Here T is self-adjoint.

Ker(T∗)=Ker(T)={e}⊥

so the conclusion of the of corollary is trivial.

In general in L2(Ω), Ω⊂RN with

Tu(x)=∫ΩK(x,y)u(y)dy

with K(x,y)=∑k=1Mφk(x)ψk(y) for some φk,ψk∈L2(Ω). We assume that φk,ψk are linearly independent. In this case:

Tu(x)=∑k=1Mφk(x)∫Ωψk(y)u(y)dy

So R(T)=span{φk}, so that rank(T)=M. The condition f⊥Ker(T∗) amounts to requiring infinitely many consistency conditions since Ker(T∗) has infinite dimension.
Since Ker(T∗)⊥ is always a closed subspace, R(T)=Ker(T∗)⊥ can only hold if T has a closed range. The range is generally not always closed.

Fredholm operators and the Fredholm alternative

Definition

T∈B(H) is of Fredholm type (a.k.a a Fredholm operator) if

  • Ker(T),Ker(T∗) are both finite dimensional.
  • R(T)=R(T)―
    For such an operator we define the index of T, as
ind(T)=dim Ker(T)−dim(Ker(T∗))

Fredholm operators of index 0 will be the most important. If one can show that an operator T belongs to this class, then we obtain immediately the conclusion:

Uniqueness⟺Existence

In other words Tu=f has at most one solution for any f∈H⟺ to the property that Tu=f has at least one solution. This is clear since if we have uniqueness then dim(Ker(T))=0=dim(Ker(T∗)) and since R(T)=Ker(T∗)⊥, thus R(T) is the entire space.

Theorem

Let T∈B(T) be a Fredholm operator of index 0. Then, either

  1. Ker(T)=Ker(T∗)={0} and Tu=f has a unique solution for every f∈H
  2. dim Ker(T)=dim Ker(T∗)=M>0 then the equation Tu=f has a solution iff f satisfies M compatibility conditions. f⊥Ker(T∗)⊥ and the general solution of Tu=f can be written as
{u=u∗+v,v∈Ker(T)}